Email security software filters phishing, malware and business email compromise attempts on top of whatever mailbox platform a client already uses, since Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace's built-in filtering catches only a portion of targeted attacks.
Updated .
| Product | Vendor | From | Free trial | Deployment | Rating | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormal AI | Abnormal AI | not published | cloud | 0 | ||
| Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud | Acronis | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Barracuda Email Protection | Barracuda Networks | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Check Point Email Security | Check Point Software Technologies | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Cisco Secure Email | Cisco | not published | Yes | cloud, on-premises, hybrid | 0 | |
| Coro | Coro | not published | No | cloud | 0 | |
| Guardz | Guardz | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Hornetsecurity 365 Total Protection | Hornetsecurity | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| IRONSCALES | IRONSCALES | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| KnowBe4 | KnowBe4 | US$2.40 per user per month | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Libraesva | LibraCyber | not published | Yes | cloud, on-premises | 0 | |
| MailGuard | MailGuard | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Mailprotector | Mailprotector | not published | cloud | 0 | ||
| Material Security | Material Security | US$4.00 per user per month | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | Microsoft | £1.54 per user per month | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Mimecast | Mimecast | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Proofpoint 365 Total Protection | Proofpoint | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Sophos Email | Sophos | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| SpamTitan | CyberSentriq | US$1.26 per user per month | Yes | cloud, on-premises, hybrid | 0 | |
| Sublime Security | Sublime Security | US$76.20 per mailbox per year | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| TrendAI Email Security | Trend Micro | not published | Yes | cloud, on-premises, hybrid | 0 | |
| Trustifi | Trustifi | US$3.00 per mailbox per month | Yes | cloud | 0 | |
| Vade | Vade | not published | Yes | cloud | 0 |
Email security sits in front of or alongside a client's mailbox platform and filters phishing, malware and business email compromise attempts that native Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace filtering misses, particularly targeted attacks that impersonate a real contact rather than obvious spam. Coverage typically includes spoofing and impersonation protection, attachment sandboxing, and either inline filtering before mail is delivered or API-based scanning that reviews mail after it lands and can pull back a malicious message. Email continuity, keeping mail flowing during a platform outage, and archiving for compliance or e-discovery are common additions but are separate features, not guaranteed with every product. It does not cover general security awareness training as its core job, though several vendors bundle a training module.
Pricing is per mailbox or per user per month in most cases, with some vendors bundling continuity and archiving into a higher tier rather than pricing them separately. Volume discounts are common at higher mailbox counts.
Phishing and malware filtering plus spoofing and impersonation protection are the baseline; beyond that, decide whether you need inline filtering, API-based post-delivery scanning, or both, since the two approaches catch different things and some vendors only offer one. DMARC monitoring helps stop a client's own domain being spoofed by others, which is a different problem from filtering incoming mail. Data loss prevention and email encryption matter for clients in regulated industries, and self-service quarantine, letting a user release their own falsely flagged mail, reduces support tickets if configured carefully.
Microsoft 365 integration is the connection that matters most, since most MSPs' clients run on Microsoft 365 and the product needs to work with its mail flow and authentication without breaking native features. Security awareness training integration matters if you want phishing simulation results and filtering data in one place rather than two separate reports for a client.
Ask whether pricing is per mailbox or per user, and what happens when a client's mailbox count changes mid-contract. Ask whether continuity and archiving, if needed, are included or billed as separate add-ons, and what the contract term and any minimum mailbox count are.
A small MSP with mostly Microsoft 365 clients on standard plans can usually cover the baseline risk with straightforward filtering and impersonation protection, without needing continuity or archiving for every client. A larger MSP serving clients in regulated industries or with compliance obligations more often needs data loss prevention, encryption and archiving as standard, and benefits from a vendor that bundles those rather than stacking separate products.
Microsoft 365's native filtering catches a meaningful share of spam and known malware but is generally weaker against targeted phishing and impersonation attempts that mimic a real contact or invoice. Most MSPs add a dedicated email security product specifically to close that gap.
Inline filtering sits in the mail flow and blocks messages before delivery, while API-based scanning reviews mail after it lands in the mailbox and can remove a malicious message retroactively. Some products offer both; check which model a vendor uses since it affects how quickly a threat is stopped.
Continuity matters most for clients who cannot tolerate any email downtime, such as those relying heavily on email for time-sensitive communication. For many smaller clients, the cost may not be justified if a short Microsoft 365 outage is an acceptable risk.
Not by default. A few vendors bundle a training module, but most email security products focus purely on filtering, and security awareness training is a separate purchase from a dedicated provider unless explicitly included.
DMARC monitoring protects a client's own domain from being spoofed by attackers sending mail that appears to come from them, which is a different problem from filtering mail coming into their inbox. Both matter, but they solve opposite directions of the same risk.